Despite the brave and patient rearguard action from Pietersen (60*) and - at last - Flintoff (51) after an excellent 116 from young Alastair Cook earlier in the innings, it was too little too late after the Aussies amassed a huge total and left England two days to bat out and save the game.
The questions will start to be asked:
- Why did we leave out Monty Panesar, clearly our most potent spinner in the last ten years (and one the Aussies had never faced)?
- Why were Giles and Jones selected when the former hadn't played for a year and the latter has been erratic with the bat, his supposed advantage over Chris Read (who must be spitting feathers)?
- Where was the Flintoff of old with the bat (although to be fair, he bowled his heart out with a dodgy ankle)?
- How can someone as dour as Collingwood score 200 in one match and then look like a rabbit in the headlights the next?
- Why did it take Harmison ten days of cricket to wake up?
- Is Anderson really better than Jon Lewis? Stuart Broad? Me, for that matter?
So what can we take from this?
- Cook looks like a fine prospect, needs temperament, will come with experience (he is only 21)
- Strauss should be captain, full stop, must make hundreds not thirties
- Bell is a good player, have to leave him in, even if Vaughan returns, but...
- Collingwood has a great average on this tour but is fighting for the place with Bell (and I guess, Key) - admittedly his astonishing fielding may get him the nod at times
- KP has been patchy this time but is sheer class, prefers a target to chase rather than having to bat out a day (though that is part of Test Match cricket, Kev mate...)
- Flintoff does not need the captaincy on top of being the main strike bowler and an attacking batsman - politely relieve him and let him be magnificent again
- Jones has blown it, Read is surely in - he owns a bat too, you know :)
- Panesar must start every test - when did the Aussies ever drop Warne after looking at the pitch and deciding it wouldn't take spin?
- Giles is now the second spinner to the mighty Panesar, as and when required
- Anderson? Mahmood? Forget it, surely Stuart Broad is the way forward, young & fiery (as he proved in the Twenty20 final)
- Hoggard continues to surprise, getting wickets through sheer grit, must stay but really should be second change to...
- Harmison can turn it on, but once in six innings is poor for a bowler of his apparent quality, needs work and fast
[cue much weeping into skinny camel latte]
it'll be a whitewash, you know...
ReplyDeleteProbably. I don't care now. If one of the newer players gets a good score, or takes 5 wickets, or makes a tricky stumping, that'll do. We need to know the future of English cricket is sound and we may as well go down trying to find out. It can't possible save Fletcher, he has to fall on his sword and some of the other selectors should be taking a good hard look too.
ReplyDeleteYou should care because it will be very embarrassing and more importantly for the team, demoralising. Can't expect them to bounce back from a whitewash in time for the World Cup.
ReplyDeleteoh well, its only a game....
I do care in so much as wanting them to play better. If they still lose both games then at least some good will have come of it if we find the correct team to take forward.
ReplyDelete*puts hands over ears for 'only a game' comment*